Astronomers have presented an explanation for the shapes of planetary nebulae. The discovery is based on a set of observations of stellar winds around aging stars. Contrary to common consensus, the team found that stellar winds are not spherical, but have a shape similar to that of planetary nebulae. The team concludes that interaction with an accompanying star or exoplanet shapes both the stellar winds and planetary nebulae. The findings were published in Science.
Dying stars swell and cool to eventually become red giants. They produce stellar winds, flows of particles that the star expels, which causes them to lose mass. Because detailed observations were lacking, astronomers have always assumed that these winds were spherical, like the stars they surround. As the star evolves further, it heats up again and the stellar radiation causes the expanding ejected layers of stellar material to glow, forming a planetary nebula.
Stellar winds around cool aging stars. The collage shows a beautiful variety of shapes such as discs, cones, and spirals. Blue-colored material comes toward us, red material moves away from us. (Image: L. Decin via ESO / ALMA)
For centuries, astronomers were in the dark about the extraordinary variety of colorful shapes of planetary nebulae that had been observed. The nebulae all seem to have a certain symmetry, but they are almost never round. Corresponding author Leen Decin said:
“The Sun — which will ultimately become a red giant — is as round as a billiard ball, so we wondered: How can such a star produce all these different shapes?”
Her team observed stellar winds around cool red giant stars with the ALMA Observatory in Chile, the largest radio telescope in the world. For the first time ever, they gathered a large, detailed collection of observations, each of them made using the exact same method. This was crucial to be able to directly compare the data and exclude biases. What the astronomers saw, surprised them. Professor Decin said:
“We noticed these winds are anything but symmetrical or round. Some of them are actually quite similar in shape to planetary nebulae.”
Companions cause different shapes of stellar winds
The astronomers could even identify different categories of shapes. Decin explained:
“Some stellar winds were disk-shaped, others contained spirals, and in a third group, we identified cones.”
This is a clear indication that the shapes weren’t created randomly. The team realized that other, low-mass stars or even heavy planets in the vicinity of the dying star were causing the different patterns. These companions are too small and dim to detect directly. Decin explained:
“Just like how a spoon that you stir in a cup of coffee with some milk can create a spiral pattern, the companion sucks material towards it as it revolves around the star and shapes the stellar wind.”
The team put this theory into models, and indeed: the shape of the stellar winds can be explained by the companions that surround them, and the rate at which the cool evolved star is losing its mass due to the stellar wind is an important parameter. Decin said:
“All our observations can be explained by the fact that the stars have a companion.”
“Our findings change a lot. Since the complexity of stellar winds was not accounted for in the past, any previous mass-loss rate estimate of old stars could be wrong by up to a factor of 10.”
The future of the Sun
The study also helps to envision what the Sun might look like when it dies in 7000 million years: Decin said:
“Jupiter or even Saturn — because they have such a big mass — are going to influence whether the Sun spends its last millennia at the heart of a spiral, a butterfly, or any of the other entrancing shapes we see in planetary nebulae today. Our calculations now indicate that a weak spiral will form in the stellar wind of the old dying sun.”
Co-author Miguel Montargès added:
“We were very excited when we explored the first images. Each star, which was only a number before, became an individual by itself. Now, to us, they have their own identity. This is the magic of having high-precision observations: stars are no longer just points anymore.”
Provided by: KU Leuven [Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.]
