“I have developed a real passion for a midge,” said Valeria Lencioni in an interview with GlacierHub. The midge in question, Diamesa steinboecki, is one of the highly endangered insects that she observed in the glacial streams of the Italian Alps where she conducts her research. When she started studying glacial fauna in 1996, little was known about the insects that populated the icy habitats. Lencioni helped the scientific community get a clear picture of what kinds of insects are living in high glacial regions in the Italian Alps, and now she has come to question the methods that are foundational to her field.
Insect collection is a routine part of entomological research. In order to gather valuable data about insect biology and genetics, scientists often capture and kill insects before bringing them back to a lab and investigating them there. This kind of study has afforded researchers many insights into insect biology and ecological conditions, but Lencioni has questions about its ethics when working with delicate populations.
Collecting endangered insects further decreases their populations
Many of the insects that live on glaciers have small populations to begin with, and as Earth’s glaciers continue to retreat, many are facing extinction. When scientists collect these endangered insects in order to study them, they further reduce these already meager populations. In a paper published in Insect Diversity and Conservation, Lencioni, who is the coordinator of the Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology at the MUSE Science Museum in Trento, Italy, argues that there is now enough data that the ongoing collecting of endangered insects can be significantly reduced.
Diamesa steinboecki has had a long journey to the streams in which Lencioni now studies it. It is hypothesized that the midge first settled in the region just before a Pleistocene glaciation by way of Central Asia. She explained that the insect acts like an indicator species for scientists working in the region. She said:
“Finding it gives us reassurance that the environment is still healthy, the level of glaciation is still high, and the glacier feeding the stream is still large.”
According to Lencioni, people regard insect life differently than they do other animal life. Lencioni said:
“In the common imagination, insects are considered numerous. Even too numerous.”
Perhaps because of this perception, the implications of taking endangered insects from their habitat are not considered fully. Lencioni added:
“The removal of animals from the environment leads to an imbalance, a disturbance, which can have consequences at ecosystem level.”
Now that sufficient specimen collection has been conducted at these glacial sites, scientists working in the area could continue to compile data by different means, argues Lencioni. She suggests that in the future, scientists could use existing literature as a reference at these sites. Lencioni said:
“It is useful to have a high sampling frequency in the first couple of years when studying a new environment. But after a couple of years, it is sufficient to return to the site every 5 or even 10 years depending on how quickly the glaciers in that area are retreating.”
Lencioni is also advocating for the advancement of a technology called Environmental DNA, which tests soil, water, or air and gives a profile of all of the trace DNA left by organisms in the area.
She notes that Environmental DNA technology is already being used to monitor terrestrial habitats and fish populations, but that it is not yet widely used to characterize populations of endangered insects. It isn’t just glacial insects that are under threat. Globally, insect populations are declining by about one percent per year. Lencioni also has concerns about other habitats, she said:
“Entomologists should consider their collection practices in any extreme habitats where local population size is reduced and the degree of isolation is high such as the caves and the springs.”
Not everyone shares Lencioni’s affinity for insects, which can make conservation efforts challenging. Raffles, the author of Insectopedia, a book that tells stories of human interactions with insects throughout history, said:
“There are particular ways that these ethical questions are inflected when it comes to insects, compared to other animals. Often people don’t even think of them as animals, for a start.”
It won’t be possible for the collection of endangered insects to halt completely if scientists want to continue to understand population dynamics in the face of climate change, but Lencioni is hoping that researchers make their collection more deliberate. Lencioni said:
“When not strictly necessary, animals should be left in their environment. Where natural biodiversity is naturally scarce it becomes even more essential.”
Provided by: Earth Institute at Columbia University [Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.]
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, or Pinterest
