When magma bubbles up toward Earth’s surface and meets groundwater, steam pressure builds, sometimes bursting into eruptions that spew currents of hot ash, such as the Ubehebe Crater in Death Valley, potentially burning and asphyxiating people and burying nearby cities. Take, for example, similar ash currents that formed during the eruptions at Mount Vesuvius, which were responsible for many of the fatalities in the city of Pompeii around 79 C.E.
These so-called phreatomagmatic eruptions do not just occur at large, mountainous volcanoes like Mount Vesuvius. They can also occur in distributed volcanic fields, where the volcanic activity is spread out over a wider, more unassuming area, and the eruptions leave behind craters called maars.
While only a handful of maar-forming phreatomagmatic eruptions have occurred throughout recorded history, geologists can estimate the hazardous areas around future maar-forming eruptions by examining how far volcanic deposits extend from maar craters. Deposits produced by currents of hot ash, called pyroclastic surges, extend 1 to 6 kilometers (0.6 to 3.7 miles) from most maar craters, suggesting that the pyroclastic surges only travel that far from an eruption site. However, that distance estimate, called the surge runout distance, may be an underestimate, according to a new study published in AGU’s Geophysical Research Letters.
The Ubehebe Crater in Death Valley
The study, led by University at Buffalo professor Greg Valentine, increases the range of pyroclastic surge runout to 10-15 kilometers (6-9 miles). The evidence for the increased runout comes from the Ubehebe Crater in California’s Death Valley, which was caused by a phreatomagmatic eruption around 2100 years ago. There, the researchers found pyroclastic surge deposits up to 9 kilometers (5.6 miles) from the crater that likely once extended even farther before being wiped away by wind and rain.
Ubehebe’s surge runout may be more representative of phreatomagmatic eruptions than the runout distances from other maar craters that have been studied. According to Valentine, there is nothing outstanding about Ubehebe’s size compared to similar craters, but Death Valley’s extremely arid environment with few plants and little erosion could have better preserved the volcanic ash deposits around Ubehebe. In other words, the researchers think erosion is the culprit for the shorter observed runout distances around other volcanic craters. Valentine said:
“Previous studies of surge runout distance had used the best data that had been available, which is based on deposits of volcanoes where similar eruptions occurred. Most of those used a few kilometers, but here, we think just because of the good preservation in Death Valley, we see evidence for a wider area of impact.”
Erik Klemetti, a volcanologist at Denison University not involved in the study, added:
“When you are trying to figure out the extent of volcanic eruptions’ impacts and you’re looking at it through the lens of the geologic record, you are beholden to what is preserved. The key point from this study is that a lot of detailed work needs to be done in places where you will not lose the volcanic deposits to really get a better sense of the average and maximum distances that some of these hazards might impact.”
The researchers also used a computer model to explain the longer surge runout distance. Although phreatomagmatic surges from maar eruptions are dangerously hot to humans, they are cooler than most other volcanic surges because the magma’s heat is lost when vaporizing the groundwater. According to the researcher’s model, these colder, and thus denser, pyroclastic surges do not rise and mix with the overlying air as much as hotter surges, which causes them to travel farther along the ground.
Re-evaluating volcanic hazard risks
Extended pyroclastic surge runout distances could have big implications for volcano hazard assessments, especially for cities built on volcanic fields where future phreatomagmatic eruptions are possible. According to Valentine:
“If you are in a large city, having a hazard that extends ten kilometers from a crater is very different from one that extends only two kilometers from the crater. The volcano could affect a much larger populated area and much more infrastructure.”
Jan Lindsay, a University of Auckland professor and co-leader of DEVORA, a multi-agency, collaborative research program that provides assessments of volcanic hazards and associated risks to the roughly 1.72 million people in Auckland, one of New Zealand’s largest cities, said:
“The study certainly has big implications for places like Auckland that are built on a volcanic field. We also have plenty of water, which is needed to create those phreatomagmatic eruptions. There is every expectation that we should have that kind of eruption should our volcanic field erupt again.”
Jessica Ball, a volcanologist at the U.S. Geological Survey’s California Volcano Observatory, helps create volcano hazard assessments at California’s Clear Lake and the surrounding area, where 17,910 people live on an active volcanic field, agrees saying:
“The study has a big impact on how we draw hazard zones for this type of volcano. We can take our knowledge of where past eruptions occurred, the stress in the Earth’s crust, where subsurface heat is located and how the eruptions behave, like the surge runout distances, to identify zones where hazards might happen.”
According to both Ball and Lindsay, accurate runout distances are needed to assess whether and where to evacuate metropolitan areas when preparing for an imminent volcanic eruption. Current hazard assessment methods may need to update their pyroclastic surge runout distances to provide more accurate assessments to policymakers, but more work is still needed to fully understand how the proposed longer pyroclastic surge runout will impact cities like Auckland, Lindsay concluded:
“For Auckland, our current volcano contingency plan factors in a 5-kilometer (3-mile) radius evacuation zone around any new vent, to account for pyroclastic surge hazards. In light of this new study, we need to first carefully consider whether the potentially longer surge distances are also possible at a future Auckland eruption, and, if so, what the risks to life and safety are beyond 5 kilometers (3 miles).”
Provided by Derek Smith, American Geophysical Union [Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.]
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, or Pinterest
