During Beijing’s military parade on September 3, 2025, an open microphone captured an extraordinary conversation between Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin. As the two leaders discussed advances in biotechnology, Putin’s interpreter described how repeated organ transplants might allow people to grow younger and even achieve immortality. Xi responded that some predict humans could live to 150 years old within this century. The exchange, reported by Reuters, raised disturbing questions about China’s ruling elite’s pursuit of extreme longevity.
Those questions extend beyond a private conversation about medical advances. For years, the CCP has faced serious allegations of systematically killing prisoners of conscience for their organs, allegations supported by extensive investigations. The conversation also drew renewed attention to Project 981, a little-known healthcare initiative linked to China’s military medical establishment and an extraordinary ambition: extending the lives of privileged officials to 150 years.
Project 981: A military-linked program for China’s elite
Project 981 reportedly began in May 2005 and is linked to the People’s Liberation Army General Hospital in Beijing, commonly known as the 301 Hospital. The hospital has long provided medical care to China’s senior leaders.
The project briefly attracted public attention in September 2019, when a promotional video circulated on the Chinese social media platform WeChat. The advertisement described an elaborate healthcare system for senior officials, emphasizing advanced medical technology, disease prevention, anti-aging treatments, and organ regeneration. It also promoted the goal of extending leaders’ lives to 150 years. According to China Digital Times, WeChat later blocked the advertisement.
Project 981 has been described as encompassing three major initiatives: a Health Promotion Project, a Youth Rejuvenation Project, and a 150-Year Longevity Project. Its five principal areas of attention reportedly include cancer prevention, sudden-death prevention, chronic disease management, anti-aging, and gonadal maintenance.
These objectives may sound like conventional healthcare goals, but they raise a much darker question when considered alongside China’s record of transplant abuses: Could the pursuit of extraordinary longevity among the ruling elite depend, at least in part, on access to organs obtained through coercion or killing?
The timing also deserves attention. Project 981 reportedly began in 2005, just one year before allegations of systematic forced organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners began receiving major international attention in 2006. Although this proximity does not establish a direct connection, it raises questions about how China’s transplantation system developed during the same period.

Could organ transplantation become preventive medicine for the powerful?
The implications of Project 981’s medical objectives become particularly troubling when viewed from the perspective of officials who might regard access to replacement organs as an entitlement of political power.
Consider cancer prevention. Genetic testing, medical imaging, and tumor-marker examinations can help identify people at elevated risk of developing certain cancers.
Liver cancer provides an example. Cirrhosis substantially increases the risk of liver cancer, with some groups of patients facing an annual risk as high as 8 percent. For carefully selected patients with serious liver disease or liver cancer, liver transplantation can be an effective treatment.
Under ordinary medical practice, transplantation is reserved for patients who meet specific clinical criteria. But what if powerful officials believed they could obtain healthy replacement organs whenever they wanted them?
Someone who feared developing liver cancer might seek a transplant before conventional medical standards would justify one. Such a procedure would still carry substantial risks, but officials who regarded donor organs as readily available might be willing to pursue treatments that other patients could never obtain.
The same concern extends to the prevention of sudden death. Heart transplantation is an established treatment for certain patients with advanced heart failure. It is not a routine preventive procedure and cannot eliminate every cardiovascular risk. Nevertheless, an official who believed a replacement heart could be obtained on demand might view transplantation as an option long before reaching the usual threshold for surgery.
Chronic disease management presents similar questions. When kidneys, lungs, or other vital organs begin to fail, transplantation can sometimes extend life significantly. For an aging political elite seeking to remain healthy and powerful, the possibility of replacing failing organs could be especially attractive.
Then there is anti-aging itself. In their September 2025 conversation, Putin and Xi openly discussed extending human life through medical technology and repeated organ replacement. Although transplantation cannot stop biological aging, their exchange revealed an extraordinary interest in the idea.
Even including gonadal maintenance among Project 981’s reported objectives suggests its ambitions extend beyond preventing death to preserving physical function and the privileges associated with youth.
The concern is not that transplantation has achieved every one of these objectives. Rather, it is what powerful individuals might attempt if they had access to an unrestricted supply of human organs.

The evidence behind China’s forced organ harvesting industry
The prospect of abusing transplantation technology is especially alarming because evidence of forced organ harvesting in China extends far beyond speculation.
In June 2019, the independent China Tribunal, chaired by Sir Geoffrey Nice, who previously led the prosecution of former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milošević, concluded that forced organ harvesting had occurred throughout China for years on a significant scale. It identified Falun Gong practitioners as one, and probably the principal, source of organs.
The tribunal examined evidence that included unusually short transplant waiting times, extensive transplantation infrastructure, and serious discrepancies between reported transplant volumes and the number of available voluntary donors.
In June 2021, United Nations human rights experts expressed alarm over credible information concerning forced organ harvesting from detained minorities, including Falun Gong practitioners, Uyghurs, Tibetans, and others.
The experts reported that detainees had allegedly been subjected to blood tests and organ examinations without their informed consent. The results were reportedly entered into databases of potential organ sources used to facilitate transplantation.
Additional evidence emerged in a 2022 study published in the American Journal of Transplantation. Researchers examined 2,838 Chinese-language transplant papers and identified 71 reports in which brain death could not have been properly established before organ procurement. Their findings strongly suggested that surgeons had participated in executions by removing organs.
These findings demonstrate why questions about elite healthcare programs cannot be dismissed as unfounded suspicion. Investigators have already uncovered substantial evidence of a transplantation system in which human lives have been sacrificed to obtain organs.
Whether Project 981 has drawn on that system remains unanswered, but the possibility deserves serious scrutiny.
Anyone could become a near-perfect organ match
One of the most disturbing implications of an unrestricted organ procurement system concerns tissue compatibility.
Organ transplantation generally requires recipients to take immunosuppressive medications to prevent rejection. These drugs weaken the immune system, increasing the risk of infections and other complications.
One important factor influencing rejection is human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility. HLA proteins help the immune system distinguish between the body’s own cells and foreign tissue. Greater compatibility between donor and recipient can improve transplant outcomes, particularly in kidney transplantation.
In exceptional cases, such as transplantation between genetically identical twins, immune compatibility may be sufficient to avoid long-term immunosuppressive treatment. For unrelated individuals, even excellent HLA matching does not guarantee freedom from rejection or eliminate the need for medication.
Nevertheless, finding a highly compatible donor can offer significant medical advantages.
For ordinary transplant patients, organ availability depends on donations, medical eligibility, and allocation procedures. They generally cannot simply demand that a suitable organ be found immediately.

But imagine a system in which those restrictions did not apply to the political elite.
With a population of approximately 1.4 billion, China has an enormous potential pool of individuals who might be compatible with a particular recipient. The larger the pool that can be medically screened, the greater the chance of identifying highly compatible donors.
If powerful officials could select prospective donors from such a population without regard for consent or human life, finding a suitable organ could become a matter of identifying and locating the right person.
For someone in that position, the human being providing the organ might cease to matter. Only the biological compatibility would count.
The danger of nationwide genetic databases
This possibility becomes more troubling when considered alongside China’s extensive collection of genetic and biometric information.
Human Rights Watch has documented widespread DNA collection by Chinese police, including samples taken from people who were not suspected of crimes. The organization reported in 2024 that China’s nationally searchable police databases might contain more than 140 million DNA profiles.
These forensic DNA records are not, by themselves, sufficient to establish organ compatibility. However, their existence demonstrates the extraordinary scale of genetic information collection already undertaken by Chinese authorities.
More directly relevant are the reports received by UN human rights experts concerning medical examinations of detained minority populations. According to those reports, blood tests and organ examinations were used to compile databases of potential organ sources.
This is a particularly chilling distinction. Rather than merely identifying individuals for law enforcement purposes, such a database could enable selecting living people based on their suitability as organ donors.
The full scope of China’s medical and genetic databases remains unclear. Nor has it been established that Project 981 can access such records. But the potential for expansion and abuse is enormous in a country where the government exercises extensive control over personal information and where individuals subjected to compulsory medical testing have little practical ability to refuse.

When human beings become a supply chain
The implications extend well beyond China’s persecuted religious and ethnic minorities.
For years, investigators have documented evidence of Falun Gong practitioners and members of other detained groups being used as involuntary organ sources. The China Tribunal’s findings and the concerns expressed by UN experts provide a grave warning about what can happen when prisoners are denied protection against such abuses.
But if the objective shifts from obtaining large numbers of organs to locating a particular biological match, the potential pool of victims could extend much further.
A person would not necessarily have to be a political dissident, a religious believer, or a member of a persecuted minority to become vulnerable. In a system that permits targeted organ procurement, the critical factor could simply be whether that person’s organs are suitable for someone with greater political power.
The reported use of medical databases to identify potential donors makes this prospect especially disturbing. What begins with exploiting imprisoned groups could, if expanded, expose ordinary citizens to the same danger.
The ultimate question is what happens when a government begins treating human beings as resources to be consumed for the benefit of those who rule.
Oil, natural gas, timber, and other natural resources can be extracted and used to serve the priorities of those in power. When people are regarded in a similar way, their bodies become another source of valuable materials, and the distinction between medical treatment and systematic killing begins to disappear.
Such a system carries the potential for crimes against humanity, mass killing, and, where the necessary intent to destroy a protected group is established, genocide.

The terrible price of pursuing immortality
Project 981’s ambitions raise questions that promotional material about medical innovation and longevity cannot answer.
Who would supply the replacement organs if China’s most powerful officials pursued increasingly aggressive transplantation procedures? Could the government’s medical and genetic databases identify compatible individuals? And what protections would prevent people from being sacrificed to extend the lives of the political elite?
The conversation between Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin did not answer these questions. But it revealed an extraordinary fascination with extending life through repeated organ replacement.
When that ambition is considered alongside the evidence of forced organ harvesting in China, the implications are profoundly disturbing.
The greatest danger is not merely that powerful officials might seek to live for 150 years. It is that they could regard other human lives as an acceptable price for pursuing that goal.
For ordinary people, the horrifying possibility is that their greatest value to the ruling elite might one day be determined not by who they are, but by the organs they carry inside their bodies.
Translated by Chua BC
Follow us on X, Facebook, or Pinterest