In every office, there’s always one person who derails lunch. The conversation is about pizza toppings, and suddenly Steve from accounting leans in and says: “Did you know the universe is basically a video game running at 60 frames per second?” And then everyone stares at their pepperoni slice and quietly reevaluates their life choices.
This isn’t because Steve is wrong. In fact, Steve is riffing on something physicists have been whispering for a century: that reality, when you zoom in far enough, stops being smooth. It stutters. It pixelates. It has limits, like the Planck length (the smallest meaningful unit of space) and the Planck time (the smallest meaningful unit of time). To talk about this is to guarantee at least one coworker will mutter: “So… simulation theory?” before scrolling TikTok.
But this is more than a stoner dorm-room thought experiment. It’s the scaffolding of our technological lives. It shapes how we build computers, design policies, and think about identity. Quantum mechanics, once an esoteric math playground, now manages your phone’s GPS, your MRI scans, your stock trades, and yes, probably your favorite Marvel movie’s CGI explosions. And the cultural weirdness — pixels at the edge of reality — isn’t just metaphor. It’s workplace policy.
The cubicle as a quantum lab
Let’s imagine a character: Diane, a mid-level project manager at a fintech startup. She has two tabs open: one is Jira, and the other is an explainer about quantum physics because her kid asked her why Ant-Man can shrink to the size of an ant.
Diane’s office is a mess of contradictions. Every stand-up meeting is a probability wave: No one shows up on time, but somehow, magically, tasks collapse into completion. Deadlines live in a Schrödinger’s box — they both exist and don’t until a client demands an update. She reads: “Particles don’t have definite positions until measured.” Diane sighs. She understands. Her developers are the particles. They both have and do not have a deliverable until she forces them into a Zoom call and observes them directly. Quantum physics, it turns out, is not just the study of the universe’s smallest building blocks. It is a mirror for organizational chaos.
Pixels, frame rates, and why IT never upgrades your monitor
The transcript provides a crash course: space and time are quantized at the most fundamental scales. The Planck length is about 1.6 x 10^-35 meters. You can’t cut it smaller without creating a black hole, which is nature’s equivalent of “access denied.” Meanwhile, the Planck time — 5.4 x 10^-44 seconds — is the interval it takes light to travel that distance.
Physicists sometimes compare this to pixels and frame rates, because in a world addicted to gaming metaphors, everything is Minecraft. But think about what that really means:
- Pixel size of reality: If you shrank down to the Planck length, you’d be smaller than the smallest imaginable voxel in the universe’s graphics engine.
- Frame rate of reality: The Planck time means nothing in the universe “updates” faster than about 10^44 frames per second. Call it God’s refresh rate.
Now compare this to your IT department, which insists you don’t need a monitor beyond 60 Hz because “it’s not in the budget.” Reality runs at 10^44 Hz, but your workstation is capped at office-Doom level. Maybe the fundamental simulation theory is corporate procurement.
Who ordered this chaos?
Why does the universe come in quantized instead of smooth? Historically, it’s because of math and embarrassment.
In the early 20th century, scientists continued to encounter paradoxes. Electrons weren’t behaving like particles. Sometimes they were waves. Sometimes they were both. Sometimes they refused to exist until someone checked. This is the equivalent of going to HR with a problem, only for HR to vanish until you say their name three times like Beetlejuice.
So, physics reinvented itself. Suddenly, we had a theory that worked, but it also meant living with the absurd. Uncertainty wasn’t a flaw of our instruments — it was baked in. As if the source code of reality shipped with TODO comments and spaghetti logic. And here’s the kicker: instead of breaking science, it made science work better. Lasers, semiconductors, quantum dots — all the things we take for granted emerged from this embrace of uncertainty. Humanity didn’t reject paradox; we monetized it.
Simulation theory: The HR memo that won’t die
Whenever someone mentions Planck units and universal pixels, the conversation veers into simulation theory. Maybe we’re living in a computer simulation. Perhaps the universe is just the backdrop for some alien teenager’s science fair project.
It’s a tempting analogy because, frankly, we’re surrounded by simulations all day. When you ask Alexa to play Fleetwood Mac, you’re talking to a probabilistic model that doesn’t “know” anything but still delivers an answer. Your phone’s FaceID isn’t “seeing” you — it’s collapsing data into probabilities that it’s you.
But as the transcript notes, simulation theory punts the question down the road: if we’re simulated, who’s simulating the simulators? This is the metaphysical equivalent of being in an endless meeting where every question spawns another sub-meeting. At some point, you leave your laptop open and make coffee.
The invisible IT staff of the cosmos
Here’s the cultural truth: humans hate invisible systems, but we also can’t stop building them. The internet is a lattice of hidden routers and undersea cables. Finance is a blur of high-frequency trades happening faster than one can think. Even your thermostat has an algorithm deciding whether you’re hot or cold.
Quantum physics fits right in. It’s the universe’s IT staff — never seen, rarely thanked, but necessary. You don’t need to know about fiber optics to send a meme, and you don’t need to understand quantum tunneling to microwave your leftovers. But it’s all happening underneath, unglamorous and relentless.
And just like IT staff, quantum mechanics occasionally sends you a passive-aggressive error message: “Your intuition cannot be found. Please consult Copenhagen interpretation.”
Brain cells, universes, and middle management
The transcript concludes with a stunning comparison: the number of Planck lengths across a brain cell is roughly equivalent to the number of brain cells across the observable universe. This is the kind of fact you drop at a party if you want to guarantee silence followed by someone opening another beer.
It also captures something weirdly bureaucratic. Human brains sit perfectly in the middle of the scale: not too big, not too small, just Goldilocks enough to imagine both directions. We’re like middle managers of the cosmos, stuck between the CEO-level vastness of galaxies and the intern-level chaos of quantum foam.
Middle managers don’t run the company, but they’re the only ones who understand both the board’s nonsense and the interns’ panic. Likewise, humans don’t run the universe, but we can at least interpret its patch notes.
So why does it matter?
Because quantum weirdness has cultural consequences, it shapes not only our science but our metaphors, our jokes, even our corporate slogans. We often say, “Everything is probabilistic,” when projects fail. We talk about “uncertainty” like it’s a principle, not a flaw. We design policies assuming risk is unavoidable, just manageable.
And of course, tech companies are already building with this stuff. Quantum computing promises to outpace classical computers in specific tasks. Banks, governments, and pharma firms are betting on it. The odds are high that in the next decade, you’ll have an app on your phone relying on physics so counterintuitive that even Einstein grumbled about it.
Which means that Diane, our project manager, will soon be managing not just developers, but also probabilities themselves. Meetings will be held inside wavefunctions. Deadlines will collapse into existence only when observed. Maybe Jira will finally make sense.
Conclusion: Embrace the glitch
So yes, Steve from accounting was right, in his way. The universe does have pixels and a frame rate. But the punchline isn’t that we’re in a simulation — it’s that the rules of the simulation don’t care if we understand them. They just run. Maybe that’s the more profound cultural lesson: uncertainty is not a bug, but a feature. Whether in physics, office politics, or global economics, you can’t eliminate ambiguity. You can only navigate it. And maybe, on a good day, you can laugh at it — because the alternative is staring too long into the cosmic pixel grid and realizing you are, at best, a middle manager in a company that doesn’t have an org chart.
Follow us on X, Facebook, or Pinterest
